Who Killed JFK Essay - 1699 Words

Review of Research The assassination of John F. Kennedy is said to be, as from the Warren report, a murder. The Warren report states that a man, Lee Harvey Oswald, fired 3 shots from the 6th floor of the Texas Book State Depository building. One missed the President’s motorcade completely; another hit President Kennedy in the neck, and the last hit him in the head, which was later said after an autopsy, to be the cause of death. The problem with the Warren report is that some eyewitnesses say that shots came from in front of the motorcade, which would mean there were two or more shooters. The FBI did little to help the Warren Commission in finding answers; initially the report was to remain sealed for 75 years or until the year†¦show more content†¦Oswald himself also had what appears to be curious ties to Cuba and Fidel Castro. In the months just prior to the Presidents assassination, Oswald was arrested in New Orleans for disturbing the peace while he was handing out pro-Castro leaf lets. While in jail he was interviewed by the FBI as his own request. The U.S. Military has also been an easy target. By sworn testimony from Robert McNamara, the Secretary of Defense at the time; in October of 1963, approximately one month before his death, President Kennedy, signed an order authorizing the pull out of 1,000 troops from Vietnam by the end of 1963. This decision was unpopular to many and was reversed by President Johnson when he took the oath of office after the Presidents untimely death. Jack Ruby, a nightclub owner in Dallas, murdered Lee Harvey Oswald as Oswald was being transferred to the county jail. Although Ruby has never been linked conclusively to the mafia, it is possible that the nature of his business required him to cross paths with underworld criminals. Ruby may have been told by a high ranking person in the mafia to kill Oswald so he couldn’t tell anything to the police. Multiple Shooters There are many different views and ideas supporting the multiple shooter theory. Some say that the shots had to come from the front because Kennedy’s head goes back and to the left. Also, they say thatShow MoreRelatedWho Killed Jfk? The Kennedy Conspiracy?1047 Words   |  5 PagesKevin Myers Professor Vollaro ENC 1101 June 8, 2016 Reader Response Essay â€Å"Who Killed JFK? The Kennedy Conspiracy† In The Week’s article, â€Å"the CIA, aliens and the Illuminati, those shots are continuing to reverberate across the US.† I believe the John F. Kennedy’s assassination was an inside job, the only problem is they’re so many variables, and so much controversy in that particular fragment of history; Politics, The Mafia, The Soviet Union, Possibly the CIA, our own government could all haveRead MoreThe Assassination of John F. Kennedy Essay916 Words   |  4 PagesF Kennedy was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald. He became the second out of the two most remembered presidents to be killed, the first being Lincoln. However, most people believe that John Wilkes Booth killed Lincoln, but most people don’t think Oswald killed JFK. Ranging from his future-self killing his past self to other crazy theories like aliens, but 55% of our nation still think that JFK was involved by some government conspiracy at the time of his death. Right now in 2014 America some people stillRead MoreJfk Was A Victim Of A Conspiracy Essay1067 Words   |  5 Pagespeople gathered in downtown Dallas, Texas to see President John F. Kennedy ride through a parade. Many spectators watched as President JFK was shot. Since JFK’s death, 50 years ago, many conspiracy theories have evolved. 73% of all Americans believe that JFK was a victim of a conspiracy (Southwell). The Warren Commission concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald killed John F. Kennedy, and that he acted alone. However, over half of the American population believe otherwise. Through the years there haveRead MoreThe Assassination Of Jfk Assassination Theory1385 Words   |  6 Pagesessay is the JFK assassination theory. I would like to research this because I have seen documents and videos online and on television about the conspiracy but I have not done full research into it to see the facts. With the presidents of the United States they are able to make or break the country with their decisions, with that JFK was assassinated due to that and other reasons. I will be going into this research thinking that there is a conspiracy behind the assassination of JFK that it wasn tRead MoreJfk And The President Jfk1368 Words   |  6 PagesJohn Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK) was assassinated in Dallas Texas. The nation and the whole world was shocked in that day. In fact, president JFK was preparing for his next combine in Texas, he took a road trip by a motorcade with his wife Jacqueline Kennedy, Governor John Connally, and his wife Nellie. The road trip went through Dealey Plaza in downtown Dallas towards the trade mart, where the president was scheduled to give a speech there. The road that the president JFK was traveling on by his motorcadeRead MoreAssassination Of The Post War 20th Century1292 Words   |  6 Pagescircumstances, together with the fact his assassin was himself murdered two days later, have led to a host of conspiracy theories over who was to blame.In 1964, the Warren Commission concluded Kennedy was killed by a lone assassin – Oswald – while three other investigations, in 1968, 1975, and 1978-79, confirmed the commission s conclusion that JFK had been killed by two shots from behind.However, the 1978-79 House select committee on assassinations decided there was a high probability that a secondRead MoreThe Assassination of Kennedy and The Cons piracies Surrounding It1530 Words   |  7 Pagespresident January of 1961. The people of America adored him and his wife, Jacqueline. However, on November 22, 1963, Kennedy was shot and killed while riding in the back of his car through Dallas, Texas. The audience of the parade he was in had to watch in horror as their idol died in front of them. He was 46 years old. We grew being told in school that the man who shot John F. Kennedy was Lee Harvey Oswald. However, as I grew older I started learning more and more outside of school about the Read MoreMystery of Who Killed John F Kennedy1483 Words   |  6 Pagescountry and the world. JFKs assassination was the first for an American President in modern times. According to the article, Latest JFK Theories, To study the assassination of John F. Kennedy is to study American history, politics, organizing crime, government, and much more (latest JFK Theories 1). An understanding has come clear that four shots were fired at JFK, including three from behind, and one from the right/front of the Presidents limousine. An attempt is and has been made to assembleRead MoreNoah Cooper. Mrs. Sites. English 10A. 15 April 2017. Lee1749 Words   |  7 Pagessatisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial. Unfortunately the facts on Oswald seem about too pat- too obvious (Marxist, Cuba, Russian wife, etc.) The Dallas police have put out statements on the Communist conspiracy theory and it was they who were in charge when he was shot and thus silenced (â€Å"The JFK Assassination† 2.) The assassination of John F. Kennedy has been a topicRead MoreA Look into the Assassination of JFK981 Words   |  4 PagesJohn Fitzgerald Kennedy was born on May 29th, 1917 in Brooklyn, Massachusetts. He was named after his grandfather, John Francis Fitzgerald, who happened to also have a career in politics as the mayor of Boston, Massachusetts. He had 8 siblings, three brothers and five sisters. His parents were Patrick Joseph Kennedy and Rose Kennedy. His early life in Massachusetts helped shape him into one of the greatest presidents America has ever had. Kennedy was an especially bright young man with many talents

What Is Suffering According To Buddha Example

Essays on What Is Suffering According To Buddha Coursework The Meaning of Suffering in Buddhism The Meaning of Suffering in Buddhism In Buddhist teachings suffering isthe inevitable truth of life. Even though such an approach seems to be pessimistic, it teaches people to be strong when they face suffering in their lives. Suffering is the most common translation of the word â€Å"dukkha† used in Sanskrit. Basically, â€Å"dukkha† means anything temporary in peoples life. The First Nobel Truth of Buddhism says that â€Å"life is dukkha† that is it translated as life is suffering. According to Harvey (2012), â€Å"dukkha† has a wide range of meanings starting from pain up to dissatisfaction. Many processes in human life are â€Å"dukkha† (painful or problematic); death, birth, aging or dissatisfaction are painful but one cannot skip them. Realistic outlook on life is required in Buddhism to look at all these things philosophically. Such states as happiness and joy are also temporary and when they pass they lea d to mental or physical pain. Overall, there is no word in English that renders full meaning of â€Å"dukkha† (Harvey, 2012).The cause of suffering is the fact that people always seek satisfaction outside themselves and they ignore their self. Buddhism teachings state that people can overcome suffering by diligent practice. There Forth Nobel Truth of Buddhism prescribes people to follow the Eightfold Path to Enlightenment by controlling their views, speech, intention, livelihood, action, mindfulness, concentration and effort (Harvey, 2012). Buddhism requires not only believing in the doctrine, but following the exact rules which lead to the desired state of body and mind. As a result, â€Å"dukkha† is not a predetermination for all. Those who follow the right way of life can eliminate suffering and be happy. ReferencesHarvey, P. (2012). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices. Cambridge University Press.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder By Counselors â€Myasssignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder By Counselors? Answer: Introducation The term refugee signifies persons who have to leave their motherland due to persecution, war and violence. Different working groups comprising of politicians, academicians, aid workers, press and other important individuals or organizations have been working industriously and religiously for the cognitive development and establishment of the socio-political dignity of the so called refugees. Another important thing in this process is migration that is also attached with this topic. The contemporary era has been quite significant in terms of refugee settlement in different countries thus entailing the emergence of global economy and global states comprising of cohesive culture. It has been observed that various countries have different views and conception regarding the refugee acceptance policy. Through this report, an attempt has been made regarding the reasons behind this different conceptions or policies (Kouider, Koglin Petermann, 2014). According to the definition of refugee defined within the framework of the United Nations, the refugees are the people owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality. They are unable or are unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country (Neuner et al. 2004)." The simple answer as to why nations should accept refugees would be that most countries over 145 of them are bound by the 1951 Convention that recognizes the status of refugees. However, this answer does not address the in depth issue that is, what political or balance of power would the 145 countries gain by becoming a signatory to a legislation that stipulates that no state parties shall return or expel a refugee in any manner to territories where his freedom and life would be threatened. The refugees are unfortunate foreigners whose life would be jeopardized on the grounds of race, religion, membership or nationality. Then why should nations accept the refugees and be concerned about them. The answer lies deep within the traditions of the Western World. Many people would argue that granting the refugees this right might jeopardize the culture and the standard of living of the citizens of the recipient countries. However, in majority of case, it is exactly the opposite. People usua lly fail to consider the other side of the coin. The refugees belong to distant countries, some of which cannot be pointed out in a map, or countries where they faced war like situation or calamities. When the countries refuse to accept the refugees, it signifies a refusal to a culture that is deep rooted within the western culture. The concept of asylum is profoundly rooted in Western Culture from Antiquity and the Medieval World. The primary reason why the countries should accept the refugees apart from their obligation under the 1951 Convention is the concept of natural right, which states that all men and women are entitled to a given set of rights by virtue of being a human. This doctrine fo natural right is explicitly explained in the beginning of the Declaration of Independence of the United States. It states that all men have been equally created and that their creator has entitled them to certain unalienable rights, among which are the right to pursuit of happiness and right to liberty. Further, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights inspired by the Declaration of Independence has included the essential ideas about the natural rights to the age-old concept of asylum. Article 14 states that everyone has the right to seek and enjoy asylum in other countries from the fear of persecution. The answer to the question why the countries should accept the refugees is because it is a part of the culture of the contemporary era and rejecting to accept the refugees is refusal of the ideas that are permits the society to flourish. The idea that every human being is entitled to pursue his own happiness and this notion is deeply entrenched in the cultural traditions. Hence, if a country rejects the concept of asylum, it amounts to rejection of the culture and humanity. The refugees should be accepted by countries as they already have suffered from the woes of war and it must be a responsibility of the country to abide by their statutory obligation to provide shelter to the refu gees, safeguarding them from being persecution. Humanity is above all and the countries must ensure that the rights of human beings to enjoy liberty and pursuit of happiness. After 1951 Refugee Convention organized by the United Nations, 142 states has signed on the protocol to provide effective shelter to the refugees. There have been several reasons behind the states to accept the refugees and where there have been several countries, which have not focused on the significance of the refugee settlement because of internal economic structure. in his case, Hungary is one of the most important signatories however, several issues have been observed in terms of providing refuge to the number of refugees. Feeble structure of the economic condition and poor political settlement policies has been affecting the refugees in the country. European countries have been effectively extending their borders to provide shelter to them. One of the most important factors is the economic condition and the per capita income of the individual citizen. Since this has been taken into certain consideration pertaining to the effective understanding of the socio political issue, it has been observed that the conflict between the locals and outsiders have become more stringent in terms of accepting the refugees. In this context, this has been taken into certain consideration pertaining to the effective understanding of the fact that in most of the cases there has been continuous fight between these two. According to a report of CNN it has been found that conflict, persecution and poverty have been playing a significant role behind the rejection of the refugees from taking shelter in many of the countries. The Western European countries have been considered as mostly sought after places by the refugees as they provide ample opportunities for them to take shelter. However there are several gateways through which they move towards their targeted places. In this context, this has been taken into certain understanding pertaining to the effective case that was highly effective in terms of creating emergency (Valtonen, 2012). However it can be stated that the problem regarding the refugees has grown tremendously and the countries are forced to change their notions regarding the refugee acceptance. The refugee crisis pushes the European countries towards the mass movement (Easton-Calabria, 2015). It has been observed that the aftermath effect of refugee problem has certain similarity with Second World War. One of the main reasons regarding the overwhelming nature of refugee is the terror caused due to Syria attack. In the recent years, it has been observed that Germany has to spend six billion euros to tackle the refugee rehabilitation program (Karageorge et al., 2017). It is a fact that the countries of the European Union are obliged to accept the refugees due to the Refugee Convention that was conducted after World War II. It has been observed by the United Nations refugee agency that it is the duty of the international community to protect the refugees. The treaty regarding the refugee had been amended in the year 1967 and more than 170 countries are signed to it. The report regarding the refugee accepting policies are shocking. It has been reported that over 360,000 refugees are facing great dilemma due to the brutality of the ISIS and civil wars. Many Gulf countries are denied to accept the refugees as thay are quite near to the provinces of Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. They are developing the fear for securing the interest of the citizens. Except the security provision, the countries are facing problem regarding the resources and supply of foods due to the refugee problem. In the Schengen area of EU, internal checking becomes a common thing. In the year 2015 to 2016, EU had spent 10 billion Euros behind refugee rehabilitation and this forced to bring a change in the financial policies of the government. Certain proposals have been taken to resettle the refugees in the provinces of Greece and Italy. Different notions have been taken by different countries regarding the refugee system. It has been observed that Germany had spent a lot of money for the resettlement of refugees. Australia has started certain refugee development program. However, the Gulf countries are unable to accept the refugees to their territory due to security issues. The cultural differences are also forced the countries to change their policies. Therefore, it can be concluded that there are certain reasons behind the different responses of the governments of different nations regarding refugee problem. More than 20000 refugees have insecure future in the Gulf countries thus moving towards Northern America and Western Europe. Due to effective geopolitical power game, the countries have been facing several issues pertaining to settlement of those refugees. It can be stated that the United Nations conventions are securing the interest of the refugees but the accepting countries are facing serious problems regarding the financial expenditures and lack of resources. These problems are different in different places and therefore, it has been observed that the policies regarding refugee rehabilitation varied from one state to another. Reference: Easton-Calabria, E. E. (2015). From bottom-up to top-down: The pre-historyof refugee livelihoods assistance from 1919 to 1979. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28(3), 412-436. Jensen, N. K., Norredam, M., Priebe, S., Krasnik, A. (2013). How do general practitioners experience providing care to refugees with mental health problems? A qualitative study from Denmark. BMC family practice, 14(1), 17. Karageorge, A., Rhodes, P., Gray, R., Papadopoulos, R. (2017). Relationship and family therapy for newly-resettled refugees: A qualitative inquiry of an innovative, needs-adapted approach in Sydney, Australia. European Psychiatry, 41, S622-S623. Keely, C. B., Elwell, P. J. (1981). Global refugee policy: the case for a development-oriented strategy. Kouider, E. B., Koglin, U., Petermann, F. (2014). Emotional and behavioral problems in migrant children and adolescents in Europe: a systematic review. European child adolescent psychiatry, 23(6), 373-391. Neuner, F., Onyut, P. L., Ertl, V., Odenwald, M., Schauer, E., Elbert, T. (2008). Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder by trained lay counselors in an African refugee settlement: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology,76(4), 686-694. Neuner, F., Schauer, M., Klaschik, C., Karunakara, U., Elbert, T. (2004). A comparison of narrative exposure therapy, supportive counseling, and psychoeducation for treating posttraumatic stress disorder in an african refugee settlement.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology,72(4), 579. Valtonen, M. K. (2012).Social work and migration: Immigrant and refugee settlement and integration. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..

Liberalism Essays - Political Ideologies, Political Culture

Liberalism The process of industrialization in England and on the Continent created an enlargement of the middle classes, e.g. the merchants, bankers, etc. Therefore, it became increasingly difficult for the conservative landowning aristocrats and monarchs to retain their power over society. The term liberalism was first used in England in around 1819. Liberal ideas of freedom of trade, freedom of speech etc. were largely shaped by the French Revolution, as were most other political doctrines. Both the advancement of the political doctrine of liberalism and the political ideas themselves were different in every country of Europe. The liberals of Britain and France were the most influential, therefore, I shall focus this essay predominantly on their influence, until the year 1832, on their respective countries in order to answer the question to what extent their influence was different. In the first chapter, I will deal with the political and economical ideologies 'all' liberals have in common. The next chapter will elaborate to what extent those liberalist ideas influenced society in France, until 1830. In the third, I will discuss the influence of liberalism in Britain up to the year 1832. Classical Liberalism: The ideologies of liberalism varied extensively in Europe from country to country, but there were also many similarities in their views of society. Liberals viewed men to be desirous for increasingly more property and respect of others, because liberals believed that the only way to get ahead in life was to gain property and respect, for the more property the better position in society. Liberals recognized that there was a need for some minimum form of government, otherwise there would be the inconvenience of every man having to be his own judge and policeman, but it would not need to be a very strong government. Government was only to restrain occasional transgressors; it was to protect the propertied against the non-propertied. Since the people also needed to be protected from an arbitrary or absolutist government, the government should be under the ultimate control of the propertied. Therefore, there should remain the power to remove or alter the legislative power, when it acts contrary to the trust that was placed in it. In other words, liberals believed in the ability of self-government and self-control, because they consid ered man to be rational in that man was capable of making independent decisions about his life. However, they did acknowledge the need for a weak government. This government was to be a constitutional monarchy, in which freedom of the press, freedom of speech, free rights of assembly, religion, and freedom to dispose over private property would be preserved in the best possible way. They were convinced that the legislative and the executive branch of government should be separate and that their actions should be mutually restrictive (based on the idea of checks and balances by John Locke). As stated previously, they were also convinced of the idea that only male property owners should be allowed to vote, because they had a stake in society. How much property was needed to be eligible to vote was a hot topic of debate amongst liberals all over Europe. Liberals were not democrats in that they supported the idea of universal male suffrage, for they feared the excesses of mob rule. However, they did believe that every adult male should have the opportunity to accumulate property to become eligible to vote and that all men were equal before the law. A liberal slogan was that careers should be open to the talents. None of the liberals in Europe was in favor of the unification of laborers into labor unions for it would be an artificial interference with the natural laws - supply and demand, diminishing returns - of the market. Moreover, liberals advocated an economy of laissez faire, i.e. free trade; to be achieved by getting rid of or at least lowering the tariffs. They were of the opinion that free trade would be beneficial to all the countries involved, for with free trade, it would be easier to exchange goods. Consequently, each country would produce what it was most suited for, thereby increasing the country's standard of living and general wealth. The doctrine of liberalism was generally supported by men of business, bankers,